2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (183 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 685 kg more than 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo (305 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac CTS.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Cadillac CTS 1982 Maserati Bi Turbo
Make Cadillac Maserati
Model CTS Bi Turbo
Year Released 2004 1982
Engine Size 2597 cc 2491 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 3 valves
Horse Power 179 HP 183 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 232 Nm 305 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1780 kg 1095 kg
Vehicle Length 4830 mm 4160 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1310 mm
Wheelbase Size 2950 mm 2510 mm