2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1983 Lada 2105
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Lada 2105. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Lada 2105 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1983 Lada 2105. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1983 Lada 2105. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 790 kg more than 1983 Lada 2105. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1983 Lada 2105 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lada |
| Model | CTS | 2105 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1198 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2430 mm |
