2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Daihatsu Leeza
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Daihatsu Leeza. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Daihatsu Leeza would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1986 Daihatsu Leeza.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Daihatsu Leeza, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Daihatsu Leeza | |
Make | Cadillac | Daihatsu |
Model | CTS | Leeza |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 548 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 62 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 60.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2140 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 28 L |