2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1986 Pontiac 1000
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Pontiac 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Pontiac 1000 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1986 Pontiac 1000. (64 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1986 Pontiac 1000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 632 kg more than 1986 Pontiac 1000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 189 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Pontiac 1000. (109 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Pontiac 1000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1986 Pontiac 1000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Pontiac |
Model | CTS | 1000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 109 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2400 mm |