2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1987 Audi 4000
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 120 more horse power than 1987 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1987 Audi 4000.
Because 1987 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1987 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1987 Audi 4000 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | CTS | 4000 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2144 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 137 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 79.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2550 mm |