2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1988 Renault 25
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault 25 would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP) has 130 more horse power than 1988 Renault 25. (90 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1988 Renault 25.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault 25, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault 25. (181 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault 25.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1988 Renault 25 | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | 25 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1988 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2068 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 90 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 89 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |