2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1988 Renault Megane
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1988 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1988 Renault Megane would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1988 Renault Megane (250 HP) has 30 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (220 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1988 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1988 Renault Megane. (181 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1988 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1988 Renault Megane | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | Megane |
Year Released | 2004 | 1988 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 181 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |