2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1990 Renault Clio
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1990 Renault Clio. (62 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1990 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 875 kg more than 1990 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 114 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Renault Clio. (118 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1990 Renault Clio | |
Make | Cadillac | Renault |
Model | CTS | Clio |
Year Released | 2004 | 1990 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.2 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 23.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 905 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |