2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1991 Chrysler ES
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1991 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 447 kg more than 1991 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1991 Chrysler ES. (165 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1991 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1991 Chrysler ES | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | CTS | ES |
Year Released | 2004 | 1991 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2212 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 165 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2470 mm |