2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1991 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1991 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1991 Ford Ranger.
Because 1991 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1991 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1991 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1991 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4690 mm |
