2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 93 more horse power than 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo. (127 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 272 kg more than 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo. (193 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1992 Mitsubishi Sapporo | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CTS | Sapporo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2351 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 193 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2610 mm |
