2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1993 Chrysler Expresso
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1993 Chrysler Expresso. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1993 Chrysler Expresso would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1993 Chrysler Expresso, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1993 Chrysler Expresso has automatic transmission and 2004 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2004 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1993 Chrysler Expresso will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1993 Chrysler Expresso | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | CTS | Expresso |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3600 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2320 mm |
