2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Acura SLX
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Acura SLX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Acura SLX would be higher. At 3,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Acura SLX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1996 Acura SLX. (190 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Acura SLX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 17 kg more than 1996 Acura SLX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Acura SLX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Acura SLX | |
Make | Cadillac | Acura |
Model | CTS | SLX |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 3494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4661 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1834 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2761 mm |