2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1996 Citroen XM
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Citroen XM would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 1996 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 312 kg more than 1996 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 124 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen XM. (174 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen XM.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 1996 Citroen XM | |
Make | Cadillac | Citroen |
Model | CTS | XM |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1280 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 66 L |