2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 50 kg more than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
| Model | CTS | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 1830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1740 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2730 mm |
