2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 1999 Seat Cordoba
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Seat Cordoba. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Seat Cordoba would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1999 Seat Cordoba. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1999 Seat Cordoba.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Seat Cordoba, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Seat Cordoba (321 Nm) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (298 Nm). This means 1999 Seat Cordoba will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 1999 Seat Cordoba | |
| Make | Cadillac | Seat |
| Model | CTS | Cordoba |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 298 Nm | 321 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2520 mm |
