2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2000 Ford Ranger. (135 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 294 kg more than 2000 Ford Ranger. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford Ranger. (250 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford Ranger.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Cadillac CTS 2000 Ford Ranger
Make Cadillac Ford
Model CTS Ranger
Year Released 2004 2000
Body Type Sedan Pickup
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3179 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 220 HP 135 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 298 Nm 250 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 3 seats
Vehicle Weight 1592 kg 1298 kg
Vehicle Length 4840 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1740 mm
Wheelbase Size 2890 mm 2800 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 55 L