2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mahindra Bolero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mahindra Bolero would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. (62 HP @ 3200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 10 kg more than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mahindra Bolero. (166 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mahindra Bolero.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Mahindra Bolero | |
Make | Cadillac | Mahindra |
Model | CTS | Bolero |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 166 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1780 kg |