2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2000 Saleen S7
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Saleen S7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Saleen S7 would be higher. At 7,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Saleen S7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Saleen S7 (550 HP) has 371 more horse power than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (179 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Saleen S7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Cadillac CTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 373 kg more than 2000 Saleen S7.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 2000 Saleen S7 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Saleen |
| Model | CTS | S7 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2597 cc | 7000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 179 HP | 550 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1247 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4755 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1981 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1041 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2692 mm |
