2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 82 kg more than 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2001 Mitsubishi Space Wagon | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS | Space Wagon |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2790 mm |