2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2001 Nissan AXY
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Nissan AXY. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Nissan AXY would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 240 more horse power than 2001 Nissan AXY. (156 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2001 Nissan AXY. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Nissan AXY weights approximately 15 kg more than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan AXY, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan AXY. (314 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan AXY.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2001 Nissan AXY | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | AXY |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 314 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1760 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 73 L |