2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2002 Peugeot Sesame
To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Peugeot Sesame. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Peugeot Sesame would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Peugeot Sesame, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 386 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Peugeot Sesame. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Peugeot Sesame.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2002 Peugeot Sesame | |
Make | Cadillac | Peugeot |
Model | CTS | Sesame |
Year Released | 2004 | 2002 |
Engine Size | 5665 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 396 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1640 mm |