2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 Ford E-150
To start off, both 2004 Cadillac CTS and 2004 Ford E-150 were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (396 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2004 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford E-150. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-150 weights approximately 382 kg more than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (536 Nm) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Ford E-150. (388 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 2004 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | CTS | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5665 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 396 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 536 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 2127 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |
