2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2004 MCC Crossblade

To start off, both 2004 Cadillac CTS and 2004 MCC Crossblade were released in the same year (2004). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP) has 145 more horse power than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (70 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2004 MCC Crossblade. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1050 kg more than 2004 MCC Crossblade. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 198 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 MCC Crossblade.

Compare all specifications: