2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | CTS | Nessie |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2790 mm |