2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 610 kg more than 2005 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2005 Nissan Bluebird is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Cadillac CTS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Bluebird will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2005 Nissan Bluebird has automatic transmission and 2004 Cadillac CTS has manual transmission. 2004 Cadillac CTS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Nissan Bluebird will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2005 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | CTS | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 1500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1780 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |