2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2005 Westfield XTR 2
To start off, 2005 Westfield XTR 2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. (173 HP @ 9800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1350 kg more than 2005 Westfield XTR 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac CTS | 2005 Westfield XTR 2 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Westfield |
| Model | CTS | XTR 2 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1297 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 173 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 9800 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 3690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2320 mm |
