2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak
To start off, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 6,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak (820 Nm) has 522 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (298 Nm). This means 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2006 Chevrolet Kodiak | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | CTS | Kodiak |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 6600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 820 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2000 mm |