2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Camry. (154 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Camry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | CTS | Camry |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 2360 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.2 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.5 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 70 L |