2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (189 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 368 kg more than 2008 Mazda RX-8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (220 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | CTS | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3173 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 189 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 300 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 238 km/hour | 223 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 7.4 seconds | 7.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |