2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2009 Chevrolet Matiz
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 3,179 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (220 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. (66 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 662 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac CTS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Cadillac CTS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (298 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz. (91 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2009 Chevrolet Matiz | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | CTS | Matiz |
Year Released | 2004 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 66 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 298 Nm | 91 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 35 L |