2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2012 Hyundai H1
To start off, 2012 Hyundai H1 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. At 2,597 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (179 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2012 Hyundai H1. (169 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2012 Hyundai H1.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (232 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Hyundai H1. (224 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Hyundai H1.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2012 Hyundai H1 | |
Make | Cadillac | Hyundai |
Model | CTS | H1 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2597 cc | 2359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 179 HP | 169 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 232 Nm | 224 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 83.2 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.6 mm | 97 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 223 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.3 seconds | 16.5 seconds |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3210 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 75 L |