2004 Cadillac CTS vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac CTS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac CTS would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 117 kg more than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac CTS. (298 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac CTS.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac CTS | 2013 Ferrari California | |
Make | Cadillac | Ferrari |
Model | CTS | California |
Year Released | 2004 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 504 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1592 kg | 1709 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4562 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1902 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1308 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 78 L |