2004 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1956 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2004 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac DeVille | 1956 Ford 12 M | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | DeVille | 12 M |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4070 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2500 mm |
