2004 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1966 Mini MK I
To start off, 2004 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mini MK I would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 241 more horse power than 1966 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1966 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1173 kg more than 1966 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (420 Nm) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mini MK I. (61 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac DeVille | 1966 Mini MK I | |
Make | Cadillac | Mini |
Model | DeVille | MK I |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 61 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2040 mm |