2004 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1967 Mercury Cougar

To start off, 2004 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (300 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 1967 Mercury Cougar. (129 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1967 Mercury Cougar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 476 kg more than 1967 Mercury Cougar. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1967 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Cadillac DeVille 1967 Mercury Cougar
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model DeVille Cougar
Year Released 2004 1967
Body Type Sedan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4565 cc 4727 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 300 HP 129 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4400 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1836 kg 1360 kg
Vehicle Length 5270 mm 4990 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2940 mm 2830 mm