2004 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1975 Volvo 66
To start off, 2004 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (420 Nm) has 326 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac DeVille | 1975 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | 66 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1289 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 56 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 94 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 77 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1550 mm |