2004 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1996 Volvo 850
To start off, 2004 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1996 Volvo 850. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1996 Volvo 850. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 331 kg more than 1996 Volvo 850. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (420 Nm) has 130 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Volvo 850. (290 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Volvo 850.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac DeVille | 1996 Volvo 850 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | DeVille | 850 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 2461 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 290 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1788 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2670 mm |