2004 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (275 HP) has 196 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac DeVille (420 Nm) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac DeVille | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | DeVille | Micra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4600 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 420 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 46 L |