2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (346 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 2111 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Lotus Elite. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
| Make | Cadillac | Lotus |
| Model | Escalade | Elite |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1963 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1216 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2691 kg | 580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1180 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2240 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 29 L |
