2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (118 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Mercury Comet. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Mercury Comet. (258 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | Escalade | Comet |
Year Released | 2004 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 3279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 103.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2950 mm |