2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (340 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1972 ZIL 114. (296 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1972 ZIL 114. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 ZIL 114 weights approximately 529 kg more than 2004 Cadillac Escalade.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 ZIL 114. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Cadillac Escalade. (380 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Cadillac Escalade.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Cadillac | ZIL |
Model | Escalade | 114 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2646 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 3770 mm |