2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 262 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1392 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 380 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Triumph |
| Model | Escalade | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2640 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2700 mm |
