2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mitsubishi Colt would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1836 kg more than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 Mitsubishi Colt. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2004 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1980 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 1980 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1980 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Escalade | Colt |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2646 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2310 mm |