2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 5,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 296 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1897 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Zastava |
| Model | Escalade | 102 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 5996 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 515 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2160 mm |
