2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1052 kg more than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Chevrolet Malibu | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
| Model | Escalade | Malibu |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5998 cc | 3790 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2527 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2760 mm |
