2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1982 Lada 1200
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Lada 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Lada 1200 would be higher. At 5,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 284 more horse power than 1982 Lada 1200. (61 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1982 Lada 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1582 kg more than 1982 Lada 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Lada 1200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 430 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Lada 1200. (85 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Lada 1200.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1982 Lada 1200 | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | Escalade | 1200 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5998 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 61 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 85 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 102 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 66 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 8.8:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2527 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 39 L |