2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (345 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (195 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade should accelerate faster than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (515 Nm) has 313 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
Make | Cadillac | Mitsubishi |
Model | Escalade | FTO |
Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 195 HP |
Torque | 515 Nm | 202 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1300 mm |