2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 1998 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 5,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1047 kg more than 1998 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2004 Cadillac Escalade is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac Escalade will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Cadillac Escalade | 1998 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Escalade | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5996 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2667 kg | 1620 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 5050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2880 mm |
