2004 Cadillac Escalade vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2004 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chevrolet Astro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chevrolet Astro would be higher. At 5,967 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1459 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac Escalade (380 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chevrolet Astro. (339 Nm). This means 2004 Cadillac Escalade will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Cadillac Escalade | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | Escalade | Astro |
Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5967 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 339 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2646 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5630 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1930 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3380 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 64 L |